Pepsi and Coke free essay sample

Coke and Pepsi Coke and Pepsi are both two big companies in the world which are known by cola. Pepsi is the biggest competitor of coke. The Coca-Cola Company is the worlds largest manufacturer, distributor and beverage company(No author, 2009-6-26) Pepsi company Is also a transnational corporation with long history. Each ot them has blg market In the world. However, a comparison of Pepsi and coke reveals several similarities but a great number of differences. Coke and Pepsi are similar in a number of ways. Hrst they are both leaders of everage companles In the world. coca-cola currently otters nearly 400 brands In over 200 countries and serves 1. 5 billion servings each day. obviously coca-cola Is very strong In beverage companies. It has an important position In the beverage market, especially In the USA and some European countries. Pepsi is the same. Pepsi dudes widely known brands, innovative products, and powerful market skills. We will write a custom essay sample on Pepsi and Coke or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In addition Pepsi plans to drive sustainable water practices and improve countryside water In china, India and Atrlca (Sodapop 2008-2-1). These actions all show Pepsis strong power. The major difference Is that coke only focus on soft drink. however Pepsi has many production on other areas. Second, Pepsi and Coke both have long history. Coca Cola was invented by a doctor named John Pemberton trom Atlanta, Georgia In May, 1880, so coke has more than 120 years history. coke was first sold at the soda fountain In Pharmacy In 1886. It Is so funny. Because Coke was not sold as a drink, however It is one kind of medicine In original. Pepsi also has long history. It was born in the Carolinas in 1898 and Invented by Bradham (Bob and Tom 2009). Pepsi and Coke were born at a similar age. They all experienced more than 120 years. Despite these similarities, Pepsi and Coke differ greatly In several ways. Coke company is focus on one area. For example all production made by coke are soft drinks. Whatever Sprite and Fanta they are all brands of beverage. So beverage is the only way which Coke go straight. However Pepsi is different from Coke, Pepsi purchased many subsidiaries. Pepsi work on a wide area, this is the bggest difference with coke. A final major difference between Pepsi and Coke is about their main production Cola. Turning to nutritional content, Pepsi has slightly more sugar, calories, and caffeine, Coke has slightly more sodium (Lubin is why Pepsi tends to win the Pepsi challenge. However the most Important matter Is brand. And cokes campaign of advertisements on TV. It is clear that the differences and similarities between Pepsi and Coke. In conclusion they all have their own special advantages.

SEO Essay

SEO Essay SEO Essay Browser Tutorial SEO - Search Engine Optimization - (en) (extkey: browser_tut_seo_en) Browser Tutorial SEO - Search Engine Optimization - (en) Browser - TYPO3 without PHP SEO - Search Engine Optimization - for the Browser - TYPO3 without PHP. This is the tutorial for SEO only. Version: 4.6.2 - 2013-09-19 Extension Key: browser_tut_seo_en Language: en Keywords: forAdmins, forIntegrators, forDevelopers, browser, typo3, without, php, seo, search engine optimization Copyright 2013, Dirk Wildt, Die Netzmacher, This document is published under the Open Content License available from opencontent.org/opl.shtml The content of this document is related to TYPO3 - a GNU/GPL CMS/Framework available from www.typo3.org 1 Browser Tutorial SEO - Search Engine Optimization - (en) (extkey: browser_tut_seo_en) Table of Contents Browser Tutorial SEO - Search Engine Optimization (en) ....................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................... 3 What does the Tutorial do? ..................................................... 3 SEO upto version 4.5 .............................................. 5 Deprecated ............................................................................ 5 Non supported from version 5.x ............................................... 5 Page object, SEO and _LOCAL_LANG ....................................... 5 SEO from version 4.6 ............................................. 4 Change Log ........................................................... 8 SEO Dynamic Tag 2 is recommended ....................................... 4 Illustration Index ................................................... 9 2 Browser Tutorial SEO - Search Engine Optimization - (en) (extkey: browser_tut_seo_en) Introduction What does the Tutorial do? This is a tutorial for the extension Browser (extkey: browser). It is only a step-by-step introduction for optimizing your website for search engines (SEO) If you are interested in other issues, please note the section "Further Informations" below. 3 Browser Tutorial SEO - Search Engine Optimization - (en) (extkey: browser_tut_seo_en) SEO from version 4.6 From version 4.6 the search engine optimization is delegated to the extension SEO Dynamic Tag 2. The cause is: SEO Dynamic Tag 2 is easier to configure. SEO Dynamic Tag 2 supports the canonical tag. The Browser SEO modul -based on SEO Dynamic Tag 1 – will still exist upto the Browser version 5.x SEO Dynamic Tag 2 is recommended See SEO Dynamic Tag 2 http://typo3.org/extensions/repository/view/seo_dynamic_tag 4 Browser Tutorial SEO - Search Engine Optimization - (en) (extkey: browser_tut_seo_en) SEO upto version 4.5 The Browser has an integrated modul for search engine optimization (SEO). The modul stores data in registers, you can configure this data and use it whiole runtime. Deprecated From version 4.6 the search engine optimization is delegated to the extension SEO Dynamic Tag 2. The cause is: SEO Dynamic Tag 2 is easier to configure. SEO Dynamic Tag 2 supports the canonical tag. Non supported from version 5.x The Browser SEO modul will still exist upto the Browser version 5.x Page object, SEO and _LOCAL_LANG TypoScript You find the TypoScript code in res/tutorial_07/step_01.txt 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. page { config { noPageTitle = 2 } headerData.20 = TEXT headerData.20 { data = register:browser_htmlTitleTag ifEmpty.field = title wrap = { field data = register:browser_keywords } } } Line 3: We don't want any page title. From

Case study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 2

Case Study Example Each medical practitioner and service provider has a different recordkeeping system in place, each of these systems has a cost of its own, having a free system in place would cut down costs remarkably. According estimates the cost reduction would be to the tune of S80 to $240 billion dollars (Laudon & Laudon, 2009). The recordkeeping systems are not interconnected with one another. An individual may have one record with their dentist, another with their general family practitioner and yet another with their gynecologist. In case one medical service provider needs to see the records from another medical service provider, the patient has to lug around the physical files. In case the patient goes to a practitioner in an emergency, they may not be able to give them a full picture of the various illnesses, sensitivities or allergies they may have, leading to a wrong diagnosis. With a central system of records in place all medical practitioners that a person visits would have access to all their medical records and would be able to get a complete picture of the persons state of health. Electronic recordkeeping will reduce the costs related to recordkeeping for each medical service provider. There may be some cost for transferring existing records to the online system. The management would have to make sure that misuse and leakage of information does not occur. The implementation of this technology would make it easier to organize and access medical records. There should be laws in place restricting the use of medical information in profiling especially through methods such as non-obvious relationship awareness which have the potential of causing trouble for law abiding citizens. HIPAA guarantees should be extended to online records. Once such guarantees are in place, medical service providers and patients will be more likely to adopt electronic medical recordkeeping. There should be a single format for all medical recordkeeping. Rival systems should be able to